Freeland calls on railways, union to 'get a deal' to avoid a massive work stoppage
"The government of Canada has a responsibility to protect the Canadian public and maintain national security, and it is time to act decisively to fulfil that obligation," said the statement.
Facing mounting calls to prevent a massive railway disruption in the coming hours, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said Wednesday the federal government expects Canada's two main railway companies and their union to "do their jobs" and reach an agreement to stave off a hit to the economy.
"We simply cannot afford, we cannot tolerate, a self-inflicted wound. And that is why I am saying with real seriousness to the companies and to the union — your country is counting on you," she told reporters during a news conference in Edmonton, Alta.
"Your friends, your neighbours, your relatives, every single one of them needs you to do your job, take your responsibility seriously and get a deal."
For the first time, Canadian National Railway (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) are both on the brink of locking out thousands of workers in the midst of simultaneous — and tense — labour negotiations.
The companies say they will start locking out workers in the early hours of Thursday if they cannot reach a deal with the union representing 9,300 engineers, conductors and yard workers. That would bring the roughly $1 billion worth of goods that move on the companies' tracks every day to a sudden stop.
The federal government has been under pressure to intervene to avoid a work stoppage that's expected to affect supply lines for a wide range of goods, from agriculture freight to manufactured products.
Earlier in the day, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Business Council of Canada, the Canadian Federation of Independent Business and the Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters issued a joint statement calling on the federal government to take "immediate action" to keep trains and the goods they carry moving.
"The government of Canada has a responsibility to protect the Canadian public and maintain national security, and it is time to act decisively to fulfil that obligation," said the statement.
They argue that under Article 107 of the federal labour code, Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon could refer the dispute to the Canada Industrial Relations Board for binding arbitration, and could prohibit a strike, a lockout or any ongoing stoppage pending a resolution.
The federal government could also reconvene Parliament and introduce back-to-work legislation, the groups say.
"This is not about siding with either party; it is about standing up for Canadians," said the business organizations' statement.
"The federal government must show leadership and act before our trains — and with them, our economy — grind to a halt. Otherwise, the steep price of inaction will be paid by Canadian families, workers and businesses."
Neither Freeland nor Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who spoke earlier in the day, suggested they're entertaining that proposal.
"Our plan is for the parties to listen to Canadians, listen to their neighbours, listen to their friends, to recognize that it is totally unacceptable for us as a country to sabotage ourselves right now," said Freeland.
"The country has no patience for dillydallying right now."
Government rejected CN's call for arbitration
The government already has has rejected CN's request for binding arbitration and has instead urged the parties to hammer it out at the negotiating table.
"My message is straightforward. It is in the best interest of both sides to continue doing the hard work at the table to find a negotiated resolution," Trudeau said during brief remarks Wednesday.
The union has been demanding better wages, benefits and working conditions for workers.
The Teamsters Canada Rail Conference has claimed that CPKC wants to "gut the collective agreement of all safety-critical fatigue provisions." The union says CN is foisting a relocation clause on employees that would force them to move across Canada for months at a time to fill labour shortages.
In a statement issued earlier this week, the Teamsters said that, so far, there have been "no meaningful advancements" in bargaining.
Barry Eidlin, associate professor and labour expert at McGill University, said Canada used to have a reputation for "being pretty trigger-happy" when it comes to imposing back-to-work legislation. That changed with the 2015 Supreme Court decision affirming the constitutional right to strike.
"We are in a different era," Eidlin said. "This current Trudeau government does seem to take that right seriously, and has repeatedly stated that the best deals are negotiated at the bargaining table."
He said there are drawbacks for both sides when binding arbitration is used.
"That, over time ... erodes the confidence in the process," he said. "And so it erodes the whole collective bargaining institution as a whole."
MacKinnon repeatedly told CBC's Power & Politics on Wednesday the government supports collective bargaining.
"I'm not going to get into what-ifs. The parties have to understand one thing very clearly, that it is in their hands, that the stakes are high," he said.